4.5 Article

Fundamental Limits of Wideband Localization - Part II: Cooperative Networks

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY
Volume 56, Issue 10, Pages 4981-5000

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2010.2059720

Keywords

Cooperative localization; Cramer-Rao bound (CRB); equivalent Fisher information (EFI); information inequality; ranging information (RI); squared position error bound (SPEB)

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [ECCS-0901034]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-09-1-0435]
  3. MIT Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The availability of position information is of great importance in many commercial, governmental, and military applications. Localization is commonly accomplished through the use of radio communication between mobile devices (agents) and fixed infrastructure (anchors). However, precise determination of agent positions is a challenging task, especially in harsh environments due to radio blockage or limited anchor deployment. In these situations, cooperation among agents can significantly improve localization accuracy and reduce localization outage probabilities. A general framework of analyzing the fundamental limits of wideband localization has been developed in Part I of the paper. Here, we build on this framework and establish the fundamental limits of wideband cooperative location-aware networks. Our analysis is based on the waveforms received at the nodes, in conjunction with Fisher information inequality. We provide a geometrical interpretation of equivalent Fisher information (EFI) for cooperative networks. This approach allows us to succinctly derive fundamental performance limits and their scaling behaviors, and to treat anchors and agents in a unified way from the perspective of localization accuracy. Our results yield important insights into how and when cooperation is beneficial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available