4.0 Article

GPGPU-Aided Ensemble Empirical-Mode Decomposition for EEG Analysis During Anesthesia

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TITB.2010.2072963

Keywords

Depth of anesthesia (DoA); electroencephalogram (EEG); ensemble empirical-mode decomposition (EEMD); general-purpose computing on the graphics processing unit (GPGPU); parallel and distributed computing; spectral entropy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90820016, 60804036]
  2. Hundred University Talent, Creative Research Excellence Program, Hebei, China
  3. Birmingham-Warwick Science City Research Alliance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ensemble empirical-mode decomposition (EEMD) is a novel adaptive time-frequency analysis method, which is particularly suitable for extracting useful information from noisy non-linear or nonstationary data. Unfortunately, since the EEMD is highly compute-intensive, the method does not apply in real-time applications on top of commercial-off-the-shelf computers. Aiming at this problem, a parallelized EEMD method has been developed using general-purpose computing on the graphics processing unit (GPGPU), namely, G-EEMD. A spectral entropy facilitated by G-EEMD was, therefore, proposed to analyze the EEG data for estimating the depth of anesthesia (DoA) in a real-time manner. In terms of EEG data analysis, G-EEMD has dramatically improved the run-time performance by more than 140 times compared to the original serial EEMD implementation. G-EEMD also performs far better than another parallelized implementation of EEMD bases on conventional CPU-based distributed computing technology despite the latter utilizes 16 high-end computing nodes for the same computing task. Furthermore, the results obtained from a pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model analysis indicate that the EEMD method is slightly more effective than its precedent alternative method (EMD) in estimating DoA, the coefficient of determination R(2) by EEMD is significantly higher than that by EMD(p < 0.05, paired t-test) and the prediction probability P(k) by EEMD is also slighter higher than that by EMD (p < 0.2, paired t-test).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available