4.8 Article

An Accurate and Robust Strip-Edge-Based Structured Light Means for Shiny Surface Micromeasurement in 3-D

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 1023-1032

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2012.2188875

Keywords

Edge detection; shiny surface; structured light system (SLS); 3-D reconstruction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61002040]
  2. NSFC-GuangDong [10171782619-2000007]
  3. Introduced Innovative R&D Team of Guangdong Province-Robot and Intelligent Information Technology Team

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three-dimensional measurement of shiny or reflective surface is a challenging issue for optical-based instrumentations. In this paper, we present a novel structured light approach for direct measurement of shiny target so as to skip the coating preprocedure. In comparison with traditional image-intensity-based structured light coding strategies like sinusoidal and line patterns, strip edges not raw image intensities are encoded in the illuminated patterns. With strip edges generally better preserved than individual image intensity in the image data in the presence of surface reflections, such a coding strategy is more robust. To remove the periodic ambiguity within strip patterns, traditional Gray code patterns are adopted. To localize the strip edges more precisely, both positive and negative strip patterns are used. An improved zero-crossing feature detector that has subpixel accuracy is proposed for strip-edge localization. The experimental setup is configured with merely an off-the-shelf pico-projector and a camera. Extensive experiments including accuracy evaluation, comparison with previous structured light algorithms, and the reconstruction of some real shiny objects are shown to demonstrate the system's accuracy and endurance against reflective nature of surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available