4.7 Article

The Accuracy of Faraday Rotation Estimation in Satellite Synthetic Aperture Radar Images

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 52, Issue 8, Pages 4799-4807

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2284635

Keywords

Ionosphere; radio propagation; spaceborne radar; synthetic aperture radar (SAR)

Funding

  1. European Space Agency [22849/09/NL/JA/ef]
  2. U.K. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H003649/1]
  3. NERC [NE/H003649/1, earth010003] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H003649/1, earth010003] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spaceborne linearly polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (SAR) provides information about surface properties and scatterer types by measuring the covariances between images formed using orthogonally polarized radio waves. However, ionospheric Faraday rotation (FR) and system calibration errors alter the balance in the polarimetric channels and distort the covariance matrix. Since FR angles are greater at lower radio frequencies, this paper focuses on the Biomass satellite, which is the European Space Agency's 7th Earth Explorer mission and will carry a P-band (435 MHz) polarimetric SAR. Its primary objective is to measure forest biomass density by combining estimates derived from the polarimetric covariance matrix with estimates based on measuring forest height with polarimetric interferometry and exploiting height-biomass allometric relations. The accuracy of four methods for estimating FR from polarimetric SAR is assessed using simulated images of forest with a range of biomass densities and system errors (H/V channel imbalances, antenna crosstalk, and noise) and over a large spread of FR angles. All methods have biases dependent on the FR, the relative phases of the crosstalk components, and the channel imbalance phase. The best performing method estimates FR to better than 5. under worst case system errors at all FR angles, so the accuracy of biomass density estimates should not be significantly affected. However, crosstalk phases are predicted to vary greatly across the Biomass antenna beam, and this could potentially cause the FR bias to vary by several degrees across the swath. These effects may occur even for the small values of FR met in L-band data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available