4.7 Article

A Self-Calibration Bundle Adjustment Method for Photogrammetric Processing of Chang'E-2 Stereo Lunar Imagery

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 52, Issue 9, Pages 5432-5442

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2288932

Keywords

Chang ' E-2 stereo imagery; self-calibration bundle adjustment (SCBA); topographic mapping

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China [2012CB719902]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41171355, 41201480]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chang ' E-2 (CE-2) lunar orbiter is the second robotic orbiter in the Chinese Lunar Exploration Program. The charge-coupled-device (CCD) camera equipped on the CE-2 orbiter acquired stereo images with a resolution of less than 10 m and global coverage. High-precision topographic mapping with CE-2 CCD stereo imagery is of great importance for scientific research, as well as for the landing preparation and surface operation of the incoming Chang'E-3 lunar rover. Uncertainties in both the interior orientation (IO) model and exterior orientation (EO) parameters of the CE-2 CCD camera can affect mapping accuracy. In this paper, a self-calibration bundle adjustment method is proposed to eliminate these effects by adding several parameters into the IO model and fitting EO parameters using a third-order polynomial. The additional IO parameters and the EO polynomial coefficients are solved as unknowns along with ground points in the adjustment process. A series of strategies is adopted to ensure the robustness and reliability of the solution. Experimental results using images from two adjacent tracks indicated that this method effectively reduced the inconsistencies in the image space from approximately 20 pixels to subpixel. Topographic profiles generated using unadjusted and adjusted CE-2 data were compared with Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter data. These comparisons indicated that the local topographies generated after bundle adjustments, which reduced elevation differences by 9-10 m, were more consistent with LOLA data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available