4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Generalized Composite Kernel Framework for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 51, Issue 9, Pages 4816-4829

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2230268

Keywords

Extended multiattribute morphological profiles (MPs); generalized composite kernel; hyperspectral imaging; multinomial logistic regression (MLR); supervised classification

Funding

  1. European Community's Marie Curie Research Training Networks Programme through Hyperspectral Imaging Network [MRTN-CT-2006-035927]
  2. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation [PEst-OE/EEI/LA0008/2011]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the Calibration of Earth Observation Systems-SPAIN Project [AYA2011-29334-C02-02]
  4. Icelandic Research Fund
  5. University of Iceland Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a new framework for the development of generalized composite kernel machines for hyperspectral image classification. We construct a new family of generalized composite kernels which exhibit great flexibility when combining the spectral and the spatial information contained in the hyperspectral data, without any weight parameters. The classifier adopted in this work is the multinomial logistic regression, and the spatial information is modeled from extended multiattribute profiles. In order to illustrate the good performance of the proposed framework, support vector machines are also used for evaluation purposes. Our experimental results with real hyperspectral images collected by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory's Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer and the Reflective Optics Spectrographic Imaging System indicate that the proposed framework leads to state-of-the-art classification performance in complex analysis scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available