4.7 Article

Spectral-Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Data Using Loopy Belief Propagation and Active Learning

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2205263

Keywords

Active learning (AL); discriminative random fields (DRFs); hyperspectral image classification; loopy belief propagation (LBP); Markov random fields (MRFs); spectral-spatial analysis

Funding

  1. European Community's Marie Curie Research Training Networks Programme [MRTN-CT-2006-035927]
  2. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation [PEst-OE/EEI/LA0008/2011]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Calibration of Earth Observation Satellites in SPAIN (CEOS-SPAIN) project [AYA2011-29334-C02-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we propose a new framework for spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral image data. The proposed approach serves as an engine in the context of which active learning algorithms can exploit both spatial and spectral information simultaneously. An important contribution of our paper is the fact that we exploit the marginal probability distribution which uses the whole information in the hyperspectral data. We learn such distributions from both the spectral and spatial information contained in the original hyperspectral data using loopy belief propagation. The adopted probabilistic model is a discriminative random field in which the association potential is a multinomial logistic regression classifier and the interaction potential is a Markov random field multilevel logistic prior. Our experimental results with hyperspectral data sets collected using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer and the Reflective Optics System Imaging Spectrometer system indicate that the proposed framework provides state-of-the-art performance when compared to other similar developments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available