4.7 Article

Hyperspectral Image Segmentation Using a New Bayesian Approach With Active Learning

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 49, Issue 10, Pages 3947-3960

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2128330

Keywords

Active learning; graph cuts; hyperspectral image segmentation; ill-posed problems; integer optimization; mutual information (MI); sparse multinomial logistic regression (MLR)

Funding

  1. European Commission [MEST-CT-2005-021175]
  2. Instituto de Telecomunicacoes
  3. [MRTN-CT-2006-035927]
  4. [AYA2008-05965-C04-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a new supervised Bayesian approach to hyperspectral image segmentation with active learning, which consists of two main steps. First, we use a multinomial logistic regression (MLR) model to learn the class posterior probability distributions. This is done by using a recently introduced logistic regression via splitting and augmented Lagrangian algorithm. Second, we use the information acquired in the previous step to segment the hyperspectral image using a multilevel logistic prior that encodes the spatial information. In order to reduce the cost of acquiring large training sets, active learning is performed based on the MLR posterior probabilities. Another contribution of this paper is the introduction of a new active sampling approach, called modified breaking ties, which is able to provide an unbiased sampling. Furthermore, we have implemented our proposed method in an efficient way. For instance, in order to obtain the time-consuming maximum a posteriori segmentation, we use the a-expansion min-cut-based integer optimization algorithm. The state-of-the-art performance of the proposed approach is illustrated using both simulated and real hyperspectral data sets in a number of experimental comparisons with recently introduced hyperspectral image analysis methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available