4.7 Article

An L-Band Ocean Geophysical Model Function Derived From PALSAR

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 47, Issue 7, Pages 1925-1936

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2008.2010864

Keywords

L-band geophysical model function (GMF); ocean surface wind-speed detection; Phased-Array L-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR); synthetic aperture radar (SAR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines L-band normalized radar cross section (NRCS) dependence on ocean surface wind. More than 90000 match-ups, each consisting of the L-band HH NRCS, incidence angles, wind speeds, and wind directions, were collected from the Phased-Array L-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR) and scatterometer wind vectors. Based on the match-ups, the L-band HH NRCS dependence on incidence angle and wind vector is modeled for 0-20-m/s wind speeds and 17 degrees-43 degrees incidence angles. The derived relation indicates that the wind sensitivity of the L-band NRCS is less than that of the C-band at moderate winds and large incidence angles, whereas comparable at stronger winds (>10 m/s) and small incidence angles. The upwind-crosswind difference is amplified in the 10-15-m/s range followed by an almost zero amplitude from 4 to 8 m/s, which represents a clear phase shift with the C-band VV and Ku-band HH models. Wind speeds are then estimated from the match-ups, based on the derived model function. A comparison with the reference scatterometer winds reveals a 0.05-m/s bias and a 1.35-m/s root mean square error, where crosswind data give rise to. large errors due to low wind sensitivity at wind speeds of around 10 m/s, particularly at large incidence angles. The L-band NRCS behavior in strong winds (>20 m/s), at which the C-band is saturated, was not determined in the current model due to the limited number of the match-ups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available