4.8 Article

Improving Risk Evaluation in FMEA With Cloud Model and Hierarchical TOPSIS Method

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 84-95

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2861719

Keywords

Cloud model; failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA); hierarchical technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS); risk management

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61773250, 71402090, 61374068]
  2. NSFC Program [71671125]
  3. Program for Shanghai Youth Top-Notch Talent

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a prospective reliability analysis technique used in a wide range of industries for enhancing the safety and reliability of systems, products, processes, and services. However, the conventional FMEA method has been criticized for inherent drawbacks that limit effectiveness and applications. In this paper, a novel integrated FMEA model based on cloud model theory and hierarchical technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method is developed to assess and rank the risk of failure modes. First, individual linguistic assessments of failure modes are converted into normal clouds. Then, FMEA team members' weights are calculated based on the subjective weighting information. Finally, the risk priority of failure modes is determined by using the cloud hierarchical TOPSIS. The newly proposed FMEA method combines the advantages of the cloud model in coping with fuzziness and randomness of linguistic assessments and the merits of hierarchical TOPSIS in solving complex decision making problems. Two empirical examples to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed FMEA are presented together with a comparison to existing methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available