4.8 Article

Fault Detection for Fuzzy Systems With Intermittent Measurements

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 398-410

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2009.2014860

Keywords

Basis-dependent Lyapunov functions; fault detection; intermittent measurements; Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy systems; uncertainties

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60825303, 60834003]
  2. 973 Project [2009CB320600]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Programme of Higher Education of China [20070213084]
  4. Heilongjiang Outstanding Youth Science Fund [JC200809]
  5. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [200801282]
  6. University of Hong Kong Research
  7. Conference Grants (CRCG) [200707176077]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the problem of fault detection for Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy systems with intermittent measurements. The communication links between the plant and the fault detection filter are assumed to be imperfect (i.e., data packet dropouts occur intermittently, which appear typically in a network environment), and a stochastic variable satisfying the Bernoulli random binary distribution is utilized to model the unreliable communication links. The aim is to design a fuzzy fault detection filter such that, for all data missing conditions, the residual system is stochastically stable and preserves a guaranteed performance. The problem is solved through a basis-dependent Lyapunov function method, which is less conservative than the quadratic approach. The results are also extended to T-S fuzzy systems with time-varying parameter uncertainties. All the results are formulated in the form of linear matrix inequalities, which can be readily solved via standard numerical software. Two examples are provided to illustrate the usefulness and applicability of the developed theoretical results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available