4.7 Article

On the scalability of real-coded Bayesian optimization algorithm

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 307-322

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEVC.2007.902856

Keywords

decomposable problems; estimation of distribution algorithms (EDAs); probabilistic models; real-coded Bayesian optimization algorithm (rBOA); scalability

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [과C6A1605] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estimation of distribution algorithms (EDAs) are major tools in evolutionary optimization. They have the ability to uncover the hidden regularities of problems and then exploit them for effective search. Real-coded Bayesian optimization algorithm (rBOA) which brings the power of discrete BOA to bear upon the continuous domain has been regarded as a milestone in the field of numerical optimization. It has been empirically observed that the rBOA solves, with subquadratic scaleup behavior, numerical optimization problems of bounded difficulty. This underlines the scalability of rBOA (at least) in practice. However, there is no firm theoretical basis for this scalability. The aim of this paper is to carry out a theoretical analysis of the scalability of rBOA in the context of additively decomposable problems with real-valued variables. The scalability is measured by the growth of the number of fitness function evaluations (in order to reach the optimum) with the size of the problem. The total number of evaluations is computed by multiplying the population size for learning a correct probabilistic model (i.e., population complexity) and the number of generations before convergence, (i.e., convergence time complexity). Experimental results support the scalability model of rBOA. The rBOA shows a subquadratic (in problem size) scalability for uniformly scaled decomposable problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available