4.5 Article

Indirect and Direct Supplier Development: Performance Implications of Individual and Combined Effects

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages 536-546

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2009.2013839

Keywords

Buyer-supplier relationships; interaction; performance implications; regression analysis; supplier development; survey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As firms concentrate on their core competencies, they become more dependent on suppliers who possess technological competencies and manufacturing capacities that the firms themselves do not have. As a consequence, firms must maintain a network of capable and reliable suppliers. Supplier development activities can often support suppliers' improvement efforts. This research shows that indirect supplier development improves suppliers' product and delivery performance and supplier capabilities, and that direct supplier development strongly improves supplier capabilities. However, supplier development efforts are less effective if indirect and direct supplier developments are applied simultaneously. Therefore, at any given time, firms should engage in either indirect or direct supplier development, not in both. The study contends that supplier development-if conducted properly-can be a powerful supplier relationship management practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available