4.3 Article

Quantitative assessment of species identification in aerial transect surveys for ice-associated seals

Journal

MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 1057-1076

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mms.12206

Keywords

abundance; aerial survey; latent state model; partial state observation; Phocidae; ice-associated seals; photo-identification; satellite imagery; species misclassification; species misidentification; species occurrence

Funding

  1. U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  2. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management [M12PG00017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Technological advances have facilitated collection of vast quantities of photographic data from aerial surveys of marine mammals. However, when it is difficult to distinguish species from a distance, reliable identification from aerial images can often be challenging. This is the case for ice-associated seals, species for which global climate change has motivated intensive monitoring efforts in recent years. We assess species and age class identification from aerial images of four ice seal species (bearded seals, Erignathus barbatus; ribbon seals, Histriophoca fasciata; ringed seals, Pusa hispida; spotted seals, Phoca largha) in the Bering Sea. We also investigate the specific phenomenological and behavioral traits commonly associated with species identification and observer confidence. We generally found species and age class misidentification occurred at relatively low levels, but only 83% of spotted seals tended to be correctly identified (with 11% mistaken as ribbon seals). We also found certain traits were strong predictors for observed species, age class, or observer confidence. Our findings add to the growing body of evidence that species misidentification is pervasive in passive sampling of animal populations. Even low levels of misidentification have been demonstrated to induce substantial biases in estimators of species distribution and abundance, and it is important that statistical models account for such errors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available