4.6 Article

Circuit modeling and performance analysis of multi-walled carbon nanotube interconnects

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages 1328-1337

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2008.922855

Keywords

carbon nanotube (CNT); circuit model; interconnect; multi-walled CNT (MWCNT); performance analysis; signal delay; single-walled CNT (SWCNT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metallic carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have received much attention for their unique characteristics as a possible alternative to Cu interconnects in future ICs. Until this date, while almost all fabrication efforts have been directed toward multi-walled CNT (MWCNT) interconnects, there is a lack of MWCNT modeling work. This paper presents, for the first time, a detailed investigation of MWCNT-based interconnect performance. A compact equivalent circuit model of MWCNTs is presented for the first time, and the performance of MWCNT interconnects is evaluated and compared against traditional Cu interconnects, as well as Single-Walled CNT (SWCNT)-based interconnects, at different interconnect levels (local, intermediate, and global) for future technology nodes. It is shown that at the intermediate and global levels, MWCNT interconnects can achieve smaller signal delay than that of Cu interconnects, and the improvements become more significant with technology scaling and increasing wire lengths. At 1000-mu m global or 500-mu m intermediate level interconnects, the delay of MWCNT interconnects can reach as low as 15% of Cu interconnect delay. It is also shown that in order for SWCNT bundles to outperform MWCNT interconnects, dense and high metallic-fraction SWCNT bundles are necessary. On the other hand, since MWCNTs are easier to fabricate with less concern about the chirality and density control, they can be attractive for immediate use as horizontal wires in VLSI, including local, intermediate, and global level interconnects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available