Journal
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 1410-1420Publisher
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2010.2093135
Keywords
Command generation; command shaping; digital filters; input shaping; vibration control
Funding
- Siemens Energy and Automation Boeing Research and Technology
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The residual vibration of flexible systems can be reduced by shaping the reference command with notch filters, low-pass filters, and input shapers. Since the introduction of robust input shaping, there has been substantial evidence that input shaping is better than both notch and low-pass filtering for suppressing vibration in mechanical systems. Much of this evidence is empirical comparisons between traditional filters and robust input shapers. Given the large variety of filters and shapers and the large number of design strategies and parameters, there is still some uncertainty as to which approach is better. This paper seeks to end this debate by proving that notch and low-pass filters are never better than input shapers for suppressing mechanical vibration. This paper expands on previous efforts by presenting a proof showing that input shapers suppress vibration more quickly than notch or low-pass filters. The problem of suppressing multi-mode vibration is also examined. Experimental results from a portable bridge crane verify key theoretical results.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available