4.5 Article

Opportunistic Flooding in Low-Duty-Cycle Wireless Sensor Networks with Unreliable Links

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS
Volume 63, Issue 11, Pages 2787-2802

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TC.2013.142

Keywords

Wireless sensor networks; low-duty-cycle networks; flooding

Funding

  1. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1444021, 0845994] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flooding service has been investigated extensively in wireless networks to efficiently disseminate network-wide commands, configurations, and code binaries. However, little work has been done on low-duty-cycle wireless sensor networks in which nodes stay asleep most of the time and wake up asynchronously. In this type of network, a broadcasting packet is rarely received by multiple nodes simultaneously, a unique constraining feature that makes existing solutions unsuitable. In this paper, we introduce Opportunistic Flooding, a novel design tailored for low-duty-cycle networks with unreliable wireless links and predetermined working schedules. Starting with an energy-optimal tree structure, probabilistic forwarding decisions are made at each sender based on the delay distribution of next-hop receivers. Only opportunistically early packets are forwarded via links outside the tree to reduce the flooding delay and redundancy in transmission. We further propose a forwarder selection method to alleviate the hidden terminal problem and a link-quality-based backoff method to resolve simultaneous forwarding operations. We show by extensive simulations and test-bed implementations that Opportunistic Flooding is close to the optimal performance achievable by oracle flooding designs. Compared with Improved Traditional Flooding, our design achieves significantly shorter flooding delay while consuming only 20-60% of the transmission energy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available