4.7 Article

Finite Alphabet Iterative Decoders-Part I: Decoding Beyond Belief Propagation on the Binary Symmetric Channel

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 61, Issue 10, Pages 4033-4045

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCOMM.2013.090513.120443

Keywords

Low-density parity-check codes; belief propagation; error floor; trapping sets; finite precision iterative decoding; binary symmetric channel

Funding

  1. NSF [CCF-0963726]
  2. Institut Universitaire de France grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce a new paradigm for finite precision iterative decoding on low-density parity-check codes over the binary symmetric channel. The messages take values from a finite alphabet, and unlike traditional quantized decoders which are quantized versions of the belief propagation (BP) decoder, the proposed finite alphabet iterative decoders (FAIDs) do not propagate quantized probabilities or log-likelihoods and the variable node update functions do not mimic the BP decoder. Rather, the update functions are maps designed using the knowledge of potentially harmful subgraphs that could be present in a given code, thereby rendering these decoders capable of outperforming the BP in the error floor region. On certain column-weight-three codes of practical interest, we show that there exist FAIDs that surpass the floating-point BP decoder in the error floor region while requiring only three bits of precision for the representation of the messages. Hence, FAIDs are able to achieve a superior performance at much lower complexity. We also provide a methodology for the selection of FAIDs that is not code-specific, but gives a set of candidate FAIDs containing potentially good decoders in the error floor region for any column-weight-three code. We validate the code generality of our methodology by providing particularly good three-bit precision FAIDs for a variety of codes with different rates and lengths.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available