4.7 Article

Coordinated Multi-Point Transmission Strategies for TDD Systems with Non-Ideal Channel Reciprocity

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 61, Issue 10, Pages 4256-4270

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCOMM.2013.090313.120667

Keywords

Coordinated multi-point (CoMP); uplink-downlink channel reciprocity; multi-cell multi-user precoder; robust optimization

Funding

  1. NEC Laboratories, China
  2. national key project of next generation wideband wireless communication networks [2011ZX03003-001]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies transmission strategies for downlink time division duplex coordinated multi-point (CoMP) systems with non-ideal uplink-downlink channel reciprocity, where several multi-antenna base stations (BSs) jointly serve multiple single-antenna users. Due to the inherent antenna calibration errors among different BSs, the uplink-downlink channels are no longer reciprocal such that the channel information at the BSs is with multiplicative noises. To mitigate the performance degradation caused by the imperfect channels, we employ a weighted sum rate estimate as the objective function for robust precoder design. To show the impact of data sharing on the performance of CoMP under the non-ideal channel reciprocity, we provide a unified framework for designing precoder for CoMP systems with different amount of data sharing. The optimal parametric linear precoder structure that maximizes the weighted sum rate estimate under per-BS power constraints is characterized, based on which a closed-form robust signal-to-leakage-plus-noise ratio (SLNR) precoder is proposed to exploit the statistics of the calibration errors. Simulation results show that the proposed precoder in conjunction with user scheduling provides substantial performance gain over Non-CoMP transmission and the CoMP transmission with non-robust precoders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available