4.7 Article

Mechanical behavior of hydrate-bearing pressure-core sediments visualized under triaxial compression

Journal

MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 451-459

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.028

Keywords

Pressure core; Hydrate-bearing sediments; Triaxial test; Hydrate saturation; Strength; Stiffness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Geomechanical and geotechnical properties are essential for evaluating the stability of deep seabed and subsea production systems for gas hydrate extraction from marine sediments. In this study, natural gas hydrate-bearing sediment was subjected to triaxial compression tests (shearing) using a newly developed triaxial testing system (TACIT) to investigate the geomechanical behavior of sediments recovered from below the seafloor in the eastern Nankai Trough, where the first Japanese offshore production test was conducted in 2013. The sediments were recovered using a hybrid pressure coring system, with pressure cores cut using onboard pressure core analysis tools. The pressure cores were subsequently transferred to our shore-based laboratory and subsampled using pressure core non-destructive analysis tools (PNATS) for the TACTT system. Pressure and temperature conditions were maintained within the hydrate stability boundary during coring and laboratory testing. An image processing technique was used to capture deformation of the sediment sample within the transparent acrylic test cell, and digital photographs were obtained for each 0.1% strain level experienced by the sample during the triaxial compression test. Analysis of the digitized images showed that sediments with 63% hydrate saturation exhibited brittle failure, whereas hydrate-free sediments exhibited ductile failure. The increase in shear strength with increasing hydrate saturation in natural gas hydrates is in agreement with previous data from sediments containing synthetic gas hydrates. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available