4.7 Editorial Material

Comment on Barckhausen et al., 2014-Evolution of the South China Sea: Revised ages for breakup and seafloor spreading

Journal

MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages 676-678

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.09.003

Keywords

Ophiolite; Slow spreading; South China Sea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We re-examined the cessation of the South China Sea seafloor spreading by using radioactive dating and fossil assemblage of the ETO, and the Te-derived age. The youngest available age for the fragment of the South China Sea is similar to 15 Ma and is more consistent with those suggested by previous studies. Moreover, recent IODP Expedition preliminary results suggested that the hemipelagic claystone layer stratigraphically bounded by igneous sequences of massive lava flow rock is Early Miocene in age. Therefore, the previous interpretations are more inclusive than those provided by Barckhasen et al. (2014) and indicate that a slow spreading ridge was more plausible to have occurred during the seafloor spreading of the South China Sea. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available