4.7 Article

Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Patients with Lymph Node-Positive Esophageal Cancer who are primarily Treated with Surgery

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue -, Pages S1340-S1349

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4658-1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Whereas the optimal therapeutic strategy in node positive esophageal cancer primarily treated by surgery remains unknown, the study was designed to evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in such population. Methods. Among 2944 consecutive patients operated on for esophageal cancer between 2000 and 2010 in 30 European centers, patients with lymph node metastasis treated by adjuvant treatment (n = 178) were compared to patients who did not received adjuvant treatment (n = 378). Multivariable analyses and propensity score matching were used to compensate for differences in baseline characteristics. Results. After matching, patients were comparable between the two groups. When comparing adjuvant treatment and nonadjuvant treatment groups, there was no significant differences in 3-year overall (40.9 vs. 35.8 %, P = 0.560) and disease-free (33.9 vs. 28.5 %, P = 0.190) survivals. Locoregional recurrence was lower in the adjuvant treatment group (14.4 vs. 30.9 %, P = 0.012). In the adjuvant treatment group, 94 patients received chemotherapy and 84 chemoradiotherapy, without significant survival benefit over chemoradiotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone (P = 0.280). Predictive factors of overall survival were age >= 60 years, ASA III-IV score, and pN+ classification. No survival benefit was observed according to histological subtype or occurrence of postoperative complications. Conclusions. Adjuvant chemo(radio) therapy did not offer survival benefit in lymph node-positive esophageal cancer patients primarily treated with surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available