4.6 Article

Cuffless Differential Blood Pressure Estimation Using Smart Phones

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 1080-1089

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2211078

Keywords

Blood pressure; cuffless; finger pulse; mobile camera; mobile phone; vascular transit time

Funding

  1. University of North Texas Institutional Review Board (IRB)
  2. National Science Foundation [CNS-0751205, CNS-0821736]
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [0821736] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0751205] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Graduate Education
  8. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1241768] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Smart phones today have become increasingly popular with the general public for their diverse functionalities such as navigation, social networking, and multimedia facilities. These phones are equipped with high-end processors, high-resolution cameras, and built-in sensors such as accelerometer, orientation-sensor, and light-sensor. According to comScore survey, 26.2% of U. S. adults use smart phones in their daily lives. Motivated by this statistic and the diverse capability of smart phones, we focus on utilizing them for biomedical applications. We present a new application of the smart phone with its built-in camera and microphone replacing the traditional stethoscope and cuff-based measurement technique, to quantify vital signs such as heart rate and blood pressure. We propose two differential blood pressure estimating techniques using the heartbeat and pulse data. The first method uses two smart phones whereas the second method replaces one of the phones with a customized external microphone. We estimate the systolic and diastolic pressure in the two techniques by computing the pulse pressure and the stroke volume from the data recorded. By comparing the estimated blood pressure values with those measured using a commercial blood pressure meter, we obtained encouraging results of 95-100% accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available