4.6 Article

High-Resolution Cardiovascular MRI by Integrating Parallel Imaging With Low-Rank and Sparse Modeling

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 60, Issue 11, Pages 3083-3092

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2266096

Keywords

Cardiovascular MRI; group sparsity; inverse problems; low-rank modeling; partial separability (PS)

Funding

  1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  2. American Heart Association
  3. [NIH-R01-EB013695]
  4. [NIH-P41-EB001977]
  5. [NIH-P41-EB015904]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has long been recognized as a powerful tool for cardiovascular imaging because of its unique potential to measure blood flow, cardiac wall motion, and tissue properties jointly. However, many clinical applications of cardiac MRI have been limited by low imaging speed. In this paper, we present a novel method to accelerate cardiovascular MRI through the integration of parallel imaging, low-rank modeling, and sparse modeling. This method consists of a novel image model and specialized data acquisition. Of particular novelty is the proposed low-rank model component, which is specially adapted to the particular low-rank structure of cardiovascular signals. Simulations and in vivo experiments were performed to evaluate the method, as well as an analysis of the low-rank structure of a numerical cardiovascular phantom. Cardiac imaging experiments were carried out on both human and rat subjects without the use of ECG or respiratory gating and without breath holds. The proposed method reconstructed 2-D human cardiac images up to 22 fps and 1.0 mm x 1.0 mm spatial resolution and 3-D rat cardiac images at 67 fps and 0.65 mm x 0.65 mm x 0.31 mm spatial resolution. These capabilities will enhance the practical utility of cardiovascular MRI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available