4.6 Article

Novel Speech Signal Processing Algorithms for High-Accuracy Classification of Parkinson's Disease

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages 1264-1271

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2183367

Keywords

Decision support tool; feature selection (FS); Parkinson's disease (PD); nonlinear speech signal processing; random forests (RF); support vector machines (SVM)

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 DC1150]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), U.K.
  3. Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA
  4. Welcome Trust [WT090651MF]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There has been considerable recent research into the connection between Parkinson's disease (PD) and speech impairment. Recently, a wide range of speech signal processing algorithms (dysphonia measures) aiming to predict PD symptom severity using speech signals have been introduced. In this paper, we test how accurately these novel algorithms can be used to discriminate PD subjects from healthy controls. In total, we compute 132 dysphonia measures from sustained vowels. Then, we select four parsimonious subsets of these dysphonia measures using four feature selection algorithms, and map these feature subsets to a binary classification response using two statistical classifiers: random forests and support vector machines. We use an existing database consisting of 263 samples from 43 subjects, and demonstrate that these new dysphonia measures can outperform state-of-the-art results, reaching almost 99% overall classification accuracy using only ten dysphonia features. We find that some of the recently proposed dysphonia measures complement existing algorithms in maximizing the ability of the classifiers to discriminate healthy controls from PD subjects. We see these results as an important step toward noninvasive diagnostic decision support in PD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available