4.6 Article

High Resolution Cerebral Blood Flow Imaging by Registered Laser Speckle Contrast Analysis

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages 1152-1157

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2037434

Keywords

Cubic B-spline interpolation; laser speckle imaging (LSI); normalized correlation registration; registered laser speckle contrast analysis (rLASCA)

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Ageing [1R01AG029681]
  2. Ministry of Education of China, and Shanghai Shuguang Program [07SG13]
  3. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laser speckle imaging (LSI) has been widely used for in vivo detecting cerebral blood flow (CBF) under various physiological and pathological conditions. So far, nearly all literature on in vivo LSI does not consider the influence of disturbances due to respiration and/or heart beating of animals. In this paper, we analyze how such physiologic motions affect the spatial resolution of the conventional laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA). We propose a registered laser speckle contrast analysis (rLASCA) method which first registers raw speckle images with a 3 x 3 convolution kernel, normalized correlation metric and cubic B-spline interpolator, and then constructs the contrast image for CBF. rLASCA not only significantly improves the distinguishability of small vessels, but also efficiently suppresses the noises induced by respiration and/ or heart beating. In an application of imaging the angiogenesis of rat's brain tumor, rLASCA outperformed the conventional LASCA in providing a much higher resolution for new small vessels. As a processing method for LSI, rLASCA can be directly applied to other LSI experiments where the disturbances from different sources (like respiration, heart beating) exist.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available