4.6 Article

Stochastic Population Model for Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 56, Issue 10, Pages 2493-2501

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2016667

Keywords

Auditory nerve (AN) fibers; cochlear implants; electrical stimulation; ion channel gating; neural prosthesis; relative spread (RS); sensory coding; stochastic ion channels; temporal jitter

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01-DC007525, P30-DC04661]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have developed a biophysical model of a population of electrically stimulated auditory nerve fibers. It can be used to interpret results from physiological and behavioral experiments with cochlear implants and propose novel stimulation strategies. Our model consists of myelinated internodes described by a passive resistor-capacitor network, membrane capacitance, and leakage current at the nodes of Ranvier, as well as stochastic representations of nodal voltage-dependent channels. To approximate physiological properties measured in the auditory nerve (AN) of an acutely deafened cat, electrical parameters of the model fiber were chosen based on literature-reported values. Using our model, we have replicated the following properties within 10% of the reported [1]-[4] feline single-fiber measurements: relative spread (5.8%), spike latency (630 mu s), jitter (93 mu s), chronaxie (238 mu s), relative refractory period (4.6 ms), and conduction velocity (14m/s). Moreover, we have successfully matched response characteristics of a population of fibers with the same number of diameter-distributed model fibers, enabling us to simulate responses of the entire AN. To demonstrate the performance of our model, we compare responses of a population of ANs stimulated with two speech encoding strategies, Continuous Interleaved Sampling and Compressed Analog.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available