4.6 Article

The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface: Accurate Performance From First-Session in BCI-Naive Subjects

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 55, Issue 10, Pages 2452-2462

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2008.923152

Keywords

Brain-computer interface; common spatial pattern analysis; electroencephalography; event-related desynchronization; machine learning; pattern classification; sensorymotor rhythms; single-trial analysis

Funding

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) [FKZ 011BE01A/B]
  2. Information Society Technologies (IST) Programme of the European

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface (BBCI) project develops a noninvasive BCI system whose key features are: 1) the use of well-established motor competences as control paradigms; 2) high-dimensional features from multichannel EEG; and 3) advanced machine-learning techniques. Spatio-spectral changes of sensorimotor rhythms are used to discriminate imagined movements (left hand, right hand, and foot). A previous feedback study [M. Krauledat, K.-R. Muller, and G. Curio. (2007) The non-invasive Berlin brain-computer Interface: Fast acquisition of effective performance in untrained subjects. NeuroImage. [Online]. 37(2), pp. 539-550. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.051] with ten subjects provided preliminary evidence that the BBCI system can be operated at high accuracy for subjects with less than five prior BCI exposures. Here, we demonstrate in a group of 14 fully BCI-naive subjects that 8 out of 14 BCI novices can perform at >84% accuracy in their very first BCI session, and a further four subjects at >70%. Thus, 12 out of 14 BCI-novices had significant above-chance level performances without any subject training even in the first session, as based on an optimized EEG analysis by advanced machine-learning algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available