4.7 Article

Distributed Connectivity Preserving Target Tracking With Random Sensing

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages 2166-2173

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2018.2867594

Keywords

Distributed control; network connectivity; random graphs; target tracking

Funding

  1. NSF [1217908]
  2. Air Force Research Laboratory, Munitions Directorate at Eglin AFB, FL, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A networked multiagent system is tasked to cooperatively track a mobile target, where agents experience random loss of sensing due to occlusions resulting from the target moving in a complex environment. A directed random graph is used to model the time-varying availability of the target states to agents, where the connection of the directed edge in the graph is assumed to be probabilistic and evolves according to a two-state Markov Model. An almost sure consensus algorithm is developed for all agents to achieve consensus on the target position. Due to limited communication capabilities (i.e.. the agents can only communicate within a certain range), agent motion may result in a disconnected communication network, leading to the failure of consensus to the target states. Motivated to preserve the graph connectivity of the position-dependent communication network, an algebraic-connectivity-based distributed motion controller is developed to ensure that the communication network remains connected during cooperative target tracking. Compared to existing results, our approach allows agents to break existing links when necessary as long as the algebraic connectivity remains positive, which provides more motion freedom for agents in mission operation. Moreover, our approach only requires information exchange within two-hop neighbors to preserve the network connectivity, which eliminates the need of iterative estimation of the algebraic connectivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available