4.7 Article

Low RCS Antennas Based on Dispersion Engineering of Spoof Surface Plasmon Polaritons

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
Volume 66, Issue 12, Pages 7111-7116

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2018.2869206

Keywords

Antenna; dispersion engineering; low radar cross section (RCS); spoof surface plasmon polaritons (SSPPs)

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  2. Innovation Fund of Xidian University
  3. Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of China [61631015]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation [61771485, 61331005, 61501503, 61471388]
  5. National Key Research and Development Program of China [SQ2017YFA0700201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we propose the design of antennas with low radar cross section (RCS) based on dispersion engineering of spoof surface plasmon polaritons (SSPPs). The antenna consists of a feeding monopole and SSPPs guiding structure placed vertically on a metal ground. By comprehensively engineering the weak and strong dispersion regimes of the SSPPs structure, the cutoff frequency of SSPPs can be made close to the upper operating frequency of the feeding monopole. In this way, the SSPPs structure serves as a high-efficiency radiator in the operating band and as a broadband absorber out of band, leading to low RCS out of band. As an example, a C-band antenna with low RCS in the X-band was designed, simulated, and measured. Both the simulation and experiment results show that the antenna can radiate in the C-band, with average gain 6 dB and fractional bandwidth 28%. In order to evaluate the RCS reduction performances, a 5 x 5 antenna array was fabricated and the mono-static RCS was measured. The measured results show that the mono-static RCS is reduced by more than 10 dB in the whole X-band (8.0-12.5 GHz), with a maximal reduction above 30 dB. The design method provides an effective alternative to low-RCS antennas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available