4.7 Article

Transformation Optics Inspired Multibeam Lens Antennas for Broadband Directive Radiation

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
Volume 61, Issue 12, Pages 5910-5922

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2013.2282905

Keywords

Collimating lens; directive emission; gradient index (GRIN) materials; metamaterials; quasi-conformal (QC) mapping; transformation optics (TO)

Funding

  1. NSF MRSEC [DMR-0820404]
  2. EPSRC [EP/I034548/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I034548/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent advancements in transformation optics (TO) and metamaterials have inspired tremendous interest in the electromagnetic community, creating a variety of novel antennas with enhanced performance, such as broad bandwidth, large gain, and high polarization efficiency. Although there could be infinitely many transformations for designing a given device, most of them result in rather complicated material compositions. This paper compares two recently introduced TO techniques, both of which lead to much simpler material requirements. In particular, a linear geometrical transformation or a quasi-conformal mapping was employed to design multi-beam collimating lenses, which possess either homogeneous or isotropic constituent materials. A systematic comparison is made for the first time between these two TO design approaches for a specific example of a quad-beam focusing lens, where the advantages and disadvantages of each method are clearly identified. Full-wave numerical simulations were performed to demonstrate the well-collimated beams produced by the TO lenses designed by either transformation. The characteristics of the two lens antennas, such as radiation pattern and bandwidth, were contrasted, providing valuable guidance on design tradeoffs for a specific application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available