4.5 Article

Improved Accuracy and Precision of Tracer Kinetic Parameters by Joint Fitting to Variable Flip Angle and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI Data

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages 1270-1281

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26013

Keywords

DCE-MRI; tracer kinetic modeling; joint estimation; precision; accuracy; heterogeneity; two-compartment exchange model

Funding

  1. Christie Medical Physics and Engineering
  2. Medical Research Council [G0701127] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [G0701127] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To improve the accuracy and precision of tracer kinetic model parameter estimates for use in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI studies of solid tumors. Theory: Quantitative DCE-MRI requires an estimate of precontrast T-1, which is obtained prior to fitting a tracer kinetic model. As T-1 mapping and tracer kinetic signal models are both a function of precontrast T-1 it was hypothesized that its joint estimation would improve the accuracy and precision of both precontrast T-1 and tracer kinetic model parameters. Methods: Accuracy and/or precision of two-compartment exchange model (2CXM) parameters were evaluated for standard and joint fitting methods in well-controlled synthetic data and for 36 bladder cancer patients. Methods were compared under a number of experimental conditions. Results: In synthetic data, joint estimation led to statistically significant improvements in the accuracy of estimated parameters in 30 of 42 conditions (improvements between 1.8% and 49%). Reduced accuracy was observed in 7 of the remaining 12 conditions. Significant improvements in precision were observed in 35 of 42 conditions (between 4.7% and 50%). In clinical data, significant improvements in precision were observed in 18 of 21 conditions (between 4.6% and 38%). Conclusion: Accuracy and precision of DCE-MRI parameter estimates are improved when signal models are fit jointly rather than sequentially. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available