4.6 Article

System-of-Systems Engineering Management: A Review of Modern History and a Path Forward

Journal

IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 484-499

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2008.2007163

Keywords

Autonomy; belonging; connectivity; diversity; emergence; fault; configuration; accounting; performance; and security (FCAPS); system-of-system engineering (SoSE) management conceptual areas; system-of-systems engineering management framework; system-of-system engineering management matrix (SoSEMM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As our knowledge of system of systems (SoS) has grown and evolved, so has our understanding of how to engineer and manage them. In systems engineering, we develop architectures and frameworks to bring meaning to this kind of uncertainty, but for SoS engineering (SoSE) we are still in search of how we can structure this understanding. In this paper, we review the SoS literature to illustrate the need to create an SoSE management framework based on the demands of constant technological progress in a complex dynamic environment. We conclude from this review that the history and evolution of defining SoS has shown that: 1) SoS can be defined by distinguishing characteristics and 2) SoS can be viewed as a network where the best practices of network management can be applied to SoSE. We use these two theories as a foundation for our objective to create an effective SoSE management framework. To accomplish this, we utilize modified fault, configuration, accounting, performance, and security (FCAPS) network principles (SoSE management conceptual areas). Furthermore, cited distinguishing characteristics of SoS are also used to present a SoSE management framework. We conclude with a case analysis of this framework using a known and well-documented SoS (i.e., Integrated Deepwater System) to illustrate how to better understand, engineer, and manage within the domain of SoSE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available