4.7 Article

Impact of Time from Completion of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Surgery on Survival Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 1515-1521

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-5020-3

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

No studies have examined the impact of the interval from conclusion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery in breast cancer patients. This study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between time interval from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery and survival outcomes. Breast cancer patients diagnosed with stage I-III disease who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy June 1995 to April 2007 were identified. The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery interval, defined as a parts per thousand currency sign4, 4-6, or > 6 weeks, on survival outcomes was examined. Descriptive statistics and Cox proportional hazards models were used. A total of 1101 patients were identified. Median time to surgery was 33 (range 8-159) days; 335 patients (30.4 %) had surgery within 4 weeks of their last dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 524 (47.6 %) within 4-6 weeks, and 242 (22.0 %) after more than 6 weeks. Median follow-up was 94 (range 3-178) months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) estimates were 79, 87, and 81 % in patients who underwent surgery a parts per thousand currency sign4, 4-6, and > 6 weeks after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively (p = 0.03). The three groups did not differ in 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) or locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS). In multivariable analysis, compared with an interval of a parts per thousand currency sign4 weeks, patients who underwent surgery at 4-6 or > 6 weeks had equivalent OS, LRFS, and RFS; a sensitivity analysis suggested worse OS in patients who underwent surgery at > 8 weeks. Patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery intervals of up to 8 weeks had equivalent OS, RFS, and LRFS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available