4.7 Article

Spatial Sensing Using Electrical Impedance Tomography

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 2357-2367

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2013.2253456

Keywords

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs); electrical impedance tomography (EIT); nanocomposites; structural health monitoring (SHM)

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CAREER CMMI-0642814, 1200521]
  2. University of California, Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society
  3. National Institute of Nano Engineering at Sandia National Laboratories
  4. UC Davis Dissertation Year Fellowship
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1200521] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The need for structural health monitoring has become critical due to aging infrastructures, legacy airplanes, and continuous development of new structural technologies. Based on an updated structural design, there is a need for new structural health monitoring paradigms that can sense the presence, location, and severity with a single measurement. This paper focuses on the first step of this paradigm, consisting of applying a sprayed conductive carbon nanotube-polymer film upon glass fiber-reinforced polymer composite substrates. Electrical impedance tomography is performed to measure changes in conductivity within the conductive films because of damage. Simulated damage is a method for validation of this approach. Finally, electrical impedance tomography measurements are taken while the conductive films are subjected to tensile and compressive strain states. This demonstrates the ability of electrical impedance tomography for not only damage detection, but active structural monitoring as well. This paper acts as a first step toward moving the structural health monitoring paradigm toward large-scale deployable spatial sensing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available