4.7 Article

Clinicopathologic Features and Outcomes of Non-B, Non-C Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatectomy

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue -, Pages S1116-S1124

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4728-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes after hepatectomy in patients with non-B, non-C (NBNC) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who were negative for hepatitis B virus surface antigen and anti-hepatitis C virus antibody. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 666 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy. The patients were divided into NBNC-HCC patients [n = 117 (17.6 %)] and hepatitis virus (HV)-HCC patients [n = 547 (82.4 %)]. We compared the clinicopathologic characteristics and long-term outcomes between the 2 groups. Two patients with incomplete virus-marker data were not analyzed. Results. NBNC-HCC patients had better liver function but more advanced and larger HCCs and a high incidence of intrahepatic metastasis compared to HV-HCC patients. Recurrence-free and overall survival were similar in both groups. Multivariate analysis showed that aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and a-fetoprotein were independently associated with disease-free and overall survival in NBNC-HCC patients after hepatectomy. High AST was significantly associated with tumor size and rate of capsule formation with cancer cell infiltration in NBNC-HCC patients, but not with other liver function tests, fibrosis, or necrosis of noncancerous lesions. Conclusions. NBNC-HCC patients have better liver function than HV-HCC patients, despite having more advanced HCC at diagnosis. There were no differences in long-term outcomes after hepatectomy between NBNC-HCC and HV-HCC patients. Preoperative AST and a-fetoprotein were independently associated with the prognosis of NBNC-HCC after hepatectomy. Serum AST levels might be associated with tumor malignancy in NBNC-HCC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available