4.7 Article

Poly-Si Based Two-Axis Differential Capacitive-Sensing Accelerometer

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages 3301-3308

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2012.2215313

Keywords

Accelerometer; capacitive sensing; gimbal-spring; inertial sensors; poly silicon; pendulum proof-mass

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 98-2221-E-007-003-MY3]
  2. National Tsing Hua University through Toward World-Class University Project [100N2049E1]
  3. Hsinchu Science Park of Taiwan [100A32]
  4. Aim for the Top University Plan of the National Chiao Tung University
  5. Ministry of Education, Taiwan
  6. Toward World-class University Project of the National Tsing Hua University [100N2049E1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports the design and implementation of a two-axis capacitive-type accelerometer using well-known two poly-Si processes. The accelerometer design consists of a pendulum proof-mass (bulk Si), a gimbal-spring (poly-Si film), and vertical-comb sensing electrodes. This design has three merits: 1) pendulum proof-mass to produce torque by in-plane acceleration; 2) high-aspect-ratio-micromachined (HARM) gimbal-springs enable the detection of two-axis accelerations; and 3) vertical-combs of different vertical positions enable the differential sensing electrodes design to detect the angular motion. In short, this paper exploits the vertical-comb electrodes for differential capacitive sensing to detect the two-axis in-plane accelerations. Measurement results show that the sensitivities (nonlinearity) of etch direction are 17.87 mV/G (2.65%) of X-axis, and 16.54 mV/G (2.71%) of Y-axis in the excitation range of 0.6 similar to 2 G. Due to the HARM gimbal-spring design, the cross axis sensitivity introduced by the Z-axis excitation is less than 0.3% for both X-axis and Y-axis sensing. However, the cross-axis error between the X-axis and the Y-axis sensing elements still need to be improved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available