4.7 Article

Surface Crack Detection for Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) Materials Using Pulsed Eddy Current Thermography

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 3261-3268

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2011.2157492

Keywords

Carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP); nondestructive testing and evaluation (NDT&E); pulsed eddy current (PEC) thermography; surface defects

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), U.K. [EP/F06151X/1]
  2. Rolls Royce
  3. Alstom
  4. University of Bath
  5. EPSRC [EP/F06151X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F06151X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is currently a requirement in many industries to inspect carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) components, such as those used in aircraft and for wind turbine blades to identify issues leading to potential failures. To detect surface cracks, pulsed eddy current (PEC) thermography is proposed as a powerful inspection technique, allowing the operator to observe the heating developed from the eddy current distribution in a structure using infrared imaging, detecting defects over a relatively wide area within a short time (of the order of milliseconds). In this paper, a PEC thermography inspection system for CFRP materials is studied and optimized. Using the system, the directional electrical conductivity of the CFRP material is observed through the surface heating pattern. Then, the normalized temperature rise and decay are investigated through the inspection of notches with varied depths and widths. The position invariance of the coil with respect to the notch along the fiber direction is also studied in the experiments. The work shows that PEC thermography can be used for defect detection and characterization through analysis of the surface heating pattern and the transient temperature change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available