4.7 Article

Resilient Asymptotic Consensus in Robust Networks

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 766-781

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSAC.2013.130413

Keywords

Consensus; In-Network Computation; Robust Networks; Resilience; Byzantine; Adversary; Distributed Algorithms

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CNS-1035655, CCF-0820088]
  2. U.S. Army Research Office [ARO W911NF-10-1-0005]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. Waterloo Institute for Complexity and Innovation (WICI)
  5. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1035655] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper addresses the problem of resilient in-network consensus in the presence of misbehaving nodes. Secure and fault-tolerant consensus algorithms typically assume knowledge of nonlocal information; however, this assumption is not suitable for large-scale dynamic networks. To remedy this, we focus on local strategies that provide resilience to faults and compromised nodes. We design a consensus protocol based on local information that is resilient to worst-case security breaches, assuming the compromised nodes have full knowledge of the network and the intentions of the other nodes. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the normal nodes to reach asymptotic consensus despite the influence of the misbehaving nodes under different threat assumptions. We show that traditional metrics such as connectivity are not adequate to characterize the behavior of such algorithms, and develop a novel graph-theoretic property referred to as network robustness. Network robustness formalizes the notion of redundancy of direct information exchange between subsets of nodes in the network, and is a fundamental property for analyzing the behavior of certain distributed algorithms that use only local information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available