4.7 Article

NLOS Identification and Mitigation for Localization Based on UWB Experimental Data

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 28, Issue 7, Pages 1026-1035

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSAC.2010.100907

Keywords

Localization; UWB; NLOS Identification; NLOS Mitigation; Support Vector Machine

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [ECCS-0901034]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-09-1-0435]
  3. Defense University [N00014-08-1-0826]
  4. MIT Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sensor networks can benefit greatly from location-awareness, since it allows information gathered by the sensors to be tied to their physical locations. Ultra-wide bandwidth (UWB) transmission is a promising technology for location-aware sensor networks, due to its power efficiency, fine delay resolution, and robust operation in harsh environments. However, the presence of walls and other obstacles presents a significant challenge in terms of localization, as they can result in positively biased distance estimates. We have performed an extensive indoor measurement campaign with FCC-compliant UWB radios to quantify the effect of non-line-of-sight (NLOS) propagation. From these channel pulse responses, we extract features that are representative of the propagation conditions. We then develop classification and regression algorithms based on machine learning techniques, which are capable of: (i) assessing whether a signal was transmitted in LOS or NLOS conditions; and (ii) reducing ranging error caused by NLOS conditions. We evaluate the resulting performance through Monte Carlo simulations and compare with existing techniques. In contrast to common probabilistic approaches that require statistical models of the features, the proposed optimization-based approach is more robust against modeling errors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available