4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

A 1 k-Pixel Video Camera for 0.7-1.1 Terahertz Imaging Applications in 65-nm CMOS

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages 2999-3012

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSSC.2012.2217851

Keywords

CMOS; distributed resistive self-mixing; resistive mixer; silicon lens; sub-millimeter wave detectors; sub-millimeter wave imaging; terahertz (THz); terahertz direct detection; terahertz imaging

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the research training group GRK 1564 Imaging New Modalities
  2. European Science Foundation
  3. CMP, France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A 1 k-pixel camera chip for active terahertz video recording at room-temperature has been fully integrated in a 65-nm CMOS bulk process technology. The 32x32 pixel array consists of 1024 differential on-chip ring antennas coupled to NMOS direct detectors operated well-beyond their cutoff frequency based on the principle of distributed resistive self-mixing. It includes row and column select and integrate-and-dump circuitry capable of capturing terahertz videos up to 500 fps. The camera chip has been packaged together with a 41.7-dBi silicon lens (measured at 856 GHz) in a 5x5x3 cm(3) camera module. It is designed for continuous-wave illumination (no lock-in technique required). In this video-mode the camera operates up to 500 fps. At 856 GHz it achieves a responsivity R-v of about 115 kV/W (incl. a 5-dB VGA gain) and a total noise equivalent power (NEPtotal) of about 12 nW integrated over its 500-kHz video bandwidth. At a 5-kHz chopping frequency (non-video mode) a single pixel can provide a maximum responsivity R-v of 140 kV/W (incl. a 5-dB VGA gain) and a minimum noise equivalent power (NEP) of 100 pW/root Hz at 856 GHz. The wide-band antenna and pixel design achieves a 3-dB bandwidth of at least 790-960 GHz.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available