4.7 Article

High-Power Operation of Terahertz Oscillators With Resonant Tunneling Diodes Using Impedance-Matched Antennas and Array Configuration

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTQE.2012.2215017

Keywords

Impedance-matching technique; resonant tunneling diodes (RTDs); slot antennas; terahertz wave oscillators

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  2. Industry-Academia Collaborative R&D from Japan Science and Technology Agency
  3. Strategic Information and Communications R&D Promotion Programme from the Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunications

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the theoretical and experimental results of an examination of the structure needed to achieve high output power in resonant tunneling diode (RTD) oscillators in the terahertz range. An offset-fed slot antenna and antenna width adjustments were employed in a single oscillator to increase the output power by increasing the radiation conductance and impedance matching. A high output power oscillation (similar to 400 mu W) at 530-590 GHz was obtained by RTDs with a large negative deferential conductance (NDC) region and offset-fed slot antennas. The maximization of the output power that was obtained by adjusting the antenna width was attributed to the impedance matching between the RTD and antenna. An output power of >1 mW is theoretically expected in an oscillator that combines an RTD with a large NDC region, offset-fed slot antenna, and antenna width adjustment. In an array configuration, oscillators with an offset structure were employed for array elements and connected together with the metal-insulator-metal stub structure. A single peak was observed in the oscillation spectrum, and combined output powers of 610, 270, and 180 mu W at 620, 770, and 810 GHz were obtained in a two-element array.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available