4.7 Article

Factors to be Considered in Bulk Heterojunction Polymer Solar Cells Fabricated by the Spray Process

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTQE.2010.2042282

Keywords

Photovoltaic cells; polymer solar cells (PSCs); spray process

Funding

  1. Korean Government (MEST) [M10500000077-06J0000-07710]
  2. Korea Ministry of Knowledge Economy [2008-N-PV08-P-01]
  3. Research Institute for Solar and Sustainable Energies
  4. Heeger Center for Advanced Materials
  5. MEST [R15-2008-006-02001-0]
  6. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology(KITECH) [2008-N-PV08-P-01] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  7. National Research Foundation of Korea [2008-0062150] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the attractions of solution-processed polymer solar cells (PSCs) is the potential for low-cost production by high-throughput roll-to-roll processes. The spray process can be suggested as an elegant alternative for PSCs fabrication due to its high production speed. We highlight the effects of sprayed droplet sizes on the film topography and drying time of droplets. We relate the latter to the PSCs device performances. The transfer efficiency and deposition rate of the spray process as a function of the droplet size are investigated for the high production speed and lowering the cost. PSC device fabrication with an optimized spray-operating condition yielded a power conversion efficiency of 3.4%. The comparable efficiency of PSCs fabricated by a roll-to-roll compatible process compared to spin-coated one achieved in this paper brings these devices one step closer to the realization of low-cost PSCs production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available