4.7 Article

Spatial-Temporal Analyses of Surface Coal Mining Dominated Land Degradation in Holingol, Inner Mongolia

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2301152

Keywords

Grassland degradation; grid cells; land cover; surface coal mining; urban expansion

Funding

  1. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan [S-10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface coal mining and urbanization, as well as crop-based agriculture, have resulted in accelerated degradation and desertification of grasslands in the Holingol region, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, over the last three decades. The purpose of this study was to investigate the spatial-temporal changes of land cover due to the surface coal-mining activities in the Holingol region from 1978 to 2011. In this study, we used the subspace method to apply land-cover classification schemes to Landsat archival images from 1978, 1988, 1999, and 2011. We then used the grid square method to investigate spatial-temporal land-cover changes during the period of 1978-2011. The results show that both surface coal mining and urban areas have increased dramatically. This expansion was accompanied by considerable loss of grassland and wetland. Grid-cell-based spatial-temporal analysis showed that urban/bare expansion had a strong negative correlation with grassland change (-0.67), coal-mining area expansion had a negative correlation with grassland change (-0.29), and coal-mining area expansion was positively correlated with urban/bare expansion (0.21). Furthermore, the correlation coefficients of land-cover categories for three time intervals between 1978 and 2011 (1978-1988, 1988-1999, and 1999-2011) showed that there was almost no correlation between grassland and coal-mining area in 1978-1988 and 19881999, but the correlation coefficient became negative (-0.21) in 1999-2011.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available