4.7 Article

Potential of Multi-Angular Data Derived From a Digital Aerial Frame Camera for Forest Classification

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2184527

Keywords

Airborne data; digital frame camera; RPV model; forest classification; linear discriminant analysis; angular sampling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The benefits of multi-angular observations for mapping vegetation and their structural and biochemical characteristics are widely recognised. This paper examines the potential of a digital aerial frame camera flown on a standard aerial survey for deriving information on the bidirectional reflectance characteristics of forest and how this information can be used in forest classification. The Rahman-Pinty-Verstraete (RPV) model was fitted to sampled angular observations. For each sample plot at least 10 angular observations were available. The RPV model concentrates the information in a few meaningful parameters and minimizes sensor noise and other perturbing factors. Relying on the fitted model parameters, it is demonstrated that the multi-angular data permits a better discrimination of five forest types as compared to the sole use of spectral information. Compared to the spectral model, the overall classification accuracy (Kappa) increased from 0.702 (0.622) to 0.872 (0.837), when multi-angular data was used. For a reliable approximation of the underlying Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) a 'balanced' observation geometry is mandatory. In particular, available measurements should cover the backward and forward scattering directions well. Otherwise, the RPV model fits the angular observations well, but the retrieved parameters do not represent the 'true' BRDF of the observed target. Under such 'unbalanced' conditions a drastic reduction in classification accuracy was observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available