4.7 Article

Optimization of dynamic microwave-assisted extraction of Armillaria polysaccharides using RSM, and their biological activity

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 1263-1269

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.07.009

Keywords

Armillaria luteo-virens (Alb. et Schw. Fr.) Sacc; Polysaccharide; Dynamic microwave-assisted extraction; Response surface methodology; Biological activity

Funding

  1. New Product Research Programs of Qinghai Province [2012-G-X05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used the Box Behnken design to optimize polysaccharide extraction from Armillaria luteo-virens (Alb. et Schw. Fr.) Sacc. The independent factors included extraction time (X-1), microwave power (X-2) and water to raw material ratio (X-3). The experimental values were fitted to a second-order polynomial equation using multiple regression analysis and a statistical method. Analysis of Variance results indicated that all factors including X-1 X-3 had an impact on Armillaria luteo-virens (Alb. et Schw. Fr.) Sacc. polysaccharide extraction, The optimal conditions for efficient yield of polysaccharide, giving a maximum yield of 8.43%, were: X-1 = 30.24 min, X-2 = 600.6 W and X-3 = 40 mL/g. The model was verified by modifying the optimal conditions (X-1 = 30 min, X-2 = 601 Wand X-3 = 40 mL/g) for practical application. A pilot scale test was also carried out under optimal conditions. The obtained yields 8.40 +/- 0.12% and 8.34 +/- 0.25% were comparable with the optimized condition, which indicated that our model is accurate. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy characterization revealed that the extracted polysaccharide produced typical absorption peaks. Oxygen radical absorbance capacity results showed the polysaccharides had good potential as an antioxidant. Moreover, the polysaccharide showed relatively strong inhibitory activity on the growth of NCI-H446 cells. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available