4.7 Article

Effect of high pressure treatment on inactivation of vegetative pathogens and on denaturation of whey proteins in different media

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages 732-738

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.085

Keywords

High pressure; Listeria monocytogenes; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Staphylococcus aureus; Whey protein denaturation

Funding

  1. grant 3rd Plan Tecnologico de Navarra (Navarra Government)
  2. Aragon Government [P1078/09]
  3. European Social Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell suspensions of Listeria monocytogenes 5366, Staphylococcus aureus 976 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa 110T were exposed to high pressure treatment from 200 to 600 MPa for 5, 10 and 15 min at an initial temperature of 20 degrees C in raw skimmed bovine milk, whey and phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 in order to determine their degree of inactivation. S. aureus was the most baroresistant bacteria followed by L monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa. A treatment at 600 MPa for 15 min was needed to obtain a reduction of 7 log10 cycles of S. aureus in all media. This treatment was selected to determine the degree of denaturation of the main whey proteins. Lactoperoxidase activity was not affected by pressure treatment applied to milk, whereas a denaturation of 80%, 70%, 44% and 7% was obtained for beta-lactoglobulin, lactoferrin, immunoglobulin G (IgG) and alpha-lactalbumin, respectively. The effect of the treatment media on denaturation was not noticeable for lactoperoxidase, alpha-lactalbumin and IgG whereas beta-lactoglobulin was more sensitive when treated in milk and lactoferrin in whey. Treatment of milk at 75 degrees C for 15 s induced a lower denaturation of beta-lactoglobulin, lactoferrin and IgG compared to pressure treatment, whereas produced a higher decrease of enzymatic activity of lactoperoxidase. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available