4.7 Article

Effects of Thermal-Infrared Emissivity Directionality on Surface Broadband Emissivity and Longwave Net Radiation Estimation

Journal

IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 499-503

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2013.2270293

Keywords

Broadband emissivity; directional emissivity; energy budget; hemispherical emissivity; radiation budget

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40901167, 41001250]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2009AA122100]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [14CX02039A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Directionality is ignored in the satellite retrieval of surface thermal-infrared emissivity, which will unavoidably affect the estimates of surface broadband emissivity and surface longwave net radiation. The purpose of this work is to quantify the effects of emissivity directionality. First, three types of emissivity data are used to calculate hemispherical emissivity and the difference between directional broadband emissivity and hemispherical broadband emissivity. The emissivity directionality is highly significant, and the directional emissivity decreases with increasing view angles. A view angle within 45 degrees-60 degrees can be found whose directional emissivity is highly close to the hemispherical emissivity, and the difference between the calculated directional and hemispherical broadband emissivity is zero. The difference between the atmospheric downward radiation and blackbody radiation at surface temperature is then determined by extensive simulations. Finally, the error ranges of surface longwave net radiation are presented. If the sensor scan angle is within +/- 55 degrees, the error can reach as high as 17.48 and 14.05 W/m(2) for water and bare ice, respectively; the error is less than 2.74 W/m(2) for snow with different radii; the error can reach 4.11 W/m(2) for sun crust; the error is less than 5.14 W/m(2) for minerals, sand, slime and gravel; and clay has the smallest error at 1.02 W/m(2).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available