4.7 Article

Quantifying Potential Energy Efficiency Gain in Green Cellular Wireless Networks

Journal

IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 2065-2091

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2014.2322951

Keywords

Energy-efficient modulation; peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR); constant-envelope modulation; energy-efficient power amplification; energy-efficient link adaptation; cell breathing; cell zooming; hierarchical cells; heterogeneous networks; sleeping mode

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1307551]
  2. Directorate For Engineering [1307551] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conventional cellular wireless networks were designed with the purpose of providing high throughput for the user and high capacity for the service provider, without any provisions of energy efficiency. As a result, these networks have an enormous Carbon footprint. In this paper, we describe the sources of the inefficiencies in such networks. First, we present results of the studies on how much Carbon footprint such networks generate. We also discuss how much more mobile traffic is expected to increase so that this Carbon footprint will even increase tremendously more. We then discuss specific sources of inefficiency and potential sources of improvement at the physical layer, as well as at higher layers of the communication protocol hierarchy. In particular, considering that most of the energy inefficiency in cellular wireless networks is at the base stations, we discuss multi-tier networks and point to the potential of exploiting mobility patterns in order to use base station energy judiciously. We then investigate potential methods to reduce this inefficiency and quantify their individual contributions. By a consideration of the combination of all potential gains, we conclude that an improvement in energy consumption in cellular wireless networks by two orders of magnitude, or even more, is possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available