4.5 Article

Functional Impairment in Older Liver Transplantation Candidates: From the Functional Assessment in Liver Transplantation Study

Journal

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages 1465-1470

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/lt.24334

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of California, San Francisco, Older Americans Independence Center [P30AG044281]
  2. National Institute on Aging, Grants for Early Medical and Surgical Subspecialists' Transition to Aging Research [R03AG045072]
  3. University of California, San Francisco, Liver Center [P30 DK026743]
  4. National Institute on Aging, Paul B. Beeson Career Development Award in Aging [K23AG048337]
  5. American College of Gastroenterology Junior Faculty Development Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The emerging epidemic of older patients with cirrhosis has led to a sharp increase in the number of >= 65 year olds considering liver transplantation (LT). However, clinicians lack objective measures to risk stratify older patients. We aimed to determine whether the short physical performance battery (SPPB), a well-validated geriatric measure of physical function, has greater prognostic value in older versus younger LT candidates. Adult outpatients listed for LT with laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score >= 12 underwent physical function testing using the SPPB, consisting of gait speed, chair stands, and balance. Patients were categorized by age (younger, < 65 years; older, >= 65 years) and SPPB (impaired, <= 9; robust, > 9). Competing risks models associated age and SPPB with wait-list death/delisting. Of 463 LT candidates, 21% were >= 65 years and 18% died or were delisted. Older patients had slower gait (1.1 versus 1.3m/seconds; P < 0.001), a trend of slower chair stands (12.8 versus 11.8 seconds; P = 0.06), and a smaller proportion able to complete all balance tests (65% versus 78%; P = 0.01); SPPB was lower in older versus younger patients (10 versus 11; P = 0.01). When compared to younger robust patients as a reference group, younger impaired patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.77; P = 0.03) and older impaired patients (HR, 2.70; P = 0.003) had significantly higher risk of wait-list mortality, but there was no difference in risk for older robust patients (HR 1.38; P - 0.35) [test of equality, P - 0.01]. After adjustment for Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium (MELD-Na) score, only older impaired patients had an increased risk of wait-list mortality compared to younger robust patients (HR, 2.36; P = 0.01; test of equality P = 0.05). In conclusion, functional impairment, as assessed by the SPPB, predicts death/delisting for LT candidates >= 65 years independent of MELD-Na. Further research into activity-based interventions to reduce adverse transplant outcomes in this population is warranted. (C) 2015 AASLD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available